The best weekly financial read in SA. As a subscriber you get online access to the new edition on Thursday morning. Register online with your subscriber number.
  Search 
  Issue  Archives
 


Advertising & Marketing
Arts & Leisure
Business
Business in Africa
Companies
Cover Story
Current Affairs
Economy & Markets
FM Focus
Front of the Book
Opinion
People
Personal Wealth Weekly
Property
Technology
Did You Hear?


Top Jobs



  • IDC Techno-Industries
  • Control Instruments Omnibridge
  • Innovations
  • Full list of reports




  • Private Equity & Venture Capital in SA
  • Top Companies 2006
  • AdFocus 2006
  • Analysts Ranking 2006
  • Property Handbook 2006
  • Top Empowerment Companies 2006
  • Budget 2006
  • Ranking the MBAs 2005
  • A Decade of Democracy
  • Little Black Book



  • World Aids Day 2004
  • Corporate Aids Awareness
  • Rally to Read
  • Cida City Campus



    Buy To Let
  • Corporate Governance
    Responsible Trustees
    Strategic Empowerment
    Tenders
    Virtual Books

    AdFocus



    Help
    Search
    Subscribe
    New Web Users
    Log in
    Past Issues
    People Index
    Advertising Rates
    Advertise
    Online Advertising
    Contact Us - email
    Contact Us
    Career Junction






    15 April 2005 Xerox. The OriginalXerox. The Original



    BEE CODES COULD BE TANGLED IN RED TAPE






    The chorus of complaints from black and white business over government's latest initiative to accelerate broad-based black economic empowerment is growing louder. The source of the unhappiness is the codes of good practice tabled by the department of trade & industry last December, designed to plug weaknesses in various sectoral charters and to bring companies outside the main sectors under the rubric of empowerment.

    As with many regulatory initiatives, the motive behind the codes is exemplary. They aim to weed out bad practices such as fronting, where white companies get credit for doing deals with black partners without ceding anything. They are also meant to make empowerment deals durable by ensuring that they offer real and more immediate benefits to new black shareholders.

    The problem is that the regulatory cart has been put before the horse. While the aim of the codes is to introduce uniformity and clarity, they are being superimposed on eight sectoral charters which are already at advanced stages of negotiation, or already gazetted, as in the mining and liquid fuels charters. Imposing uniformity in these conditions causes consternation.

    Business's main preoccupations are that the misalignment between the charters and the codes is creating uncertainty: it remains unclear which takes precedence. The effect is that empowerment deals are frozen as companies wait for clarity.

    Companies that already fall under the charters are dismayed that they could be told to go back to the drawing board after expending time and energy hammering out sectoral deals.

    Ideally, the codes should have formed the bedrock on which the charters were built. Since that opportunity has now passed, it is incumbent on government to ensure that the empowerment process doesn't become ensnared in complexity and confusion.

    SA cannot attain the economic growth it needs without a more equitable distribution of wealth. But that won't be achieved, nor will SA earn a reputation as a desirable haven for investment, if bureaucratic zeal trumps commonsense and simplicity.






    BDFM Publishers (Pty) Ltd disclaims all liability for any loss, damage, injury or expense however caused, arising from the use of, or reliance upon, in any manner, the information provided through this service and does not warrant the truth, accuracy or completeness of the information provided. The publisher's permission is required to reproduce the contents in any form including, capture into a database, website, intranet or extranet.
    © BDFM Publishers 2010


    Member of the Online Publishers Association